An Essay on Chan -- essays research papers

An Essay Answering Questions From the Assigned textbook by FaureThis essay will attempt to answer questions coming from the Bernard Faure text assigned in class. The questions are as follows How does Hu Shihs go on to Chan disaccord from D.T. Suzukis? Why was the scholarship of the Japanese on Zen non objective? What does Faure connote by the teleological fallacy? What does he mean by the two alternative approaches he suggests structural analysis and hermeneutics?How does Hu Shihs approach to Chan differ form D.T. Suzukis? To answer this we must eldest recognize that Hu Shih emphasizes the historicism of Chan, meaning he places great importance on the historical aspect, while Suzuki aligns himself with the metaphysics aspect. Suzuki states that there are two kinds of people who can speech closely Zen The first(Suzuki), which is one who has a firm grasp on the concepts and greatly understands Zen, the other(Hu Shih), someone who is utterly unable to grab the concepts. Suzuki states that Hu Shih may manage Zen historically, but that he does not actually know Zen. Suzuki says about Hu Shih that it is not a historians business not talk about Zen. Hu argues that a historic approach to Zen cannot be reduced to the circumstances of its development and how it transmits its situation of departure into a means to understand itself and others. Since Hu Shih is from the academic world, his approach to Zen is more factual, while ...