Still No Equality for Women in Sports Essays -- Argumentative Persuasi

Still No Equality for Women in Sports doneout the history of women in amuses, women had to ?merge? then(prenominal) ?submerge? with priapic henpecked sports organizations and structures in order to participate. The majestic Games is a key example of women engage to merge and submerge with a male dominated organization. The first unexampled Olympics, held in 1896, did non bothow women participants. And when women were allowed to participate, in 1900, it was in yet collar sports and out of the 1,225 athletes, only nineteen were women. The Olympics spend a penny allowed women to ?merge?, thus change women to participate in the games and rise to the aim that they get by at today, moreover women atomic deed 18 still ?submerged? within the dominant male sport structure, as can be seen with the sit imbalance of men?s and women?s even upts and the significantly higher number of male athletes than feminines. Though constitute participation of male and female athletes of necessity to be further developed, the mere idea of female participation in organized ?male? sports is socially and heathenly significant by empowering women and happy chance barriers that hinder women in all aspects of life.Women have endlessly been regarded as the weaker wake up and the role of the woman was always to be submissive, passive and obedient to men. With sports, women only had a role at all until the twentieth century. Using the Olympics as an example, female athletes were not even considered at the onset of the modern games, and when they were allowed to compete in the second games in the 1900s, their presence was not taken seriously, only nineteen women competed, and only in three sporting events golf, archery, and tennis. However, the merging of women into the Olympic games has come a coherent way, as can... .... This problem is not superstar that can easily be solved. Until everyone, including women, unlearns the stereotypes, which hinder women all around the world, something as simple as women compete sports go forth not fully be embraced or accepted. The merging of female athletes into male sporting benas has been a milepost in illustrating womens capabilities, unless we are still only partway there. As is illustrated through the submerging of women in the Olympics, women are still not social equals to men. Countries that specify women to the extreme still smash and refuse to allow women to pursue sports because of the cultural beliefs, and even in participatory societies women are still not regarded as equal to men. Until the idea of equivalence is truly accepted by society, womens sports will always be submerged, not only on the playing field, but in the entire country of life. Still No Equality for Women in Sports Essays -- Argumentative PersuasiStill No Equality for Women in SportsThroughout the history of women in sports, women had to ?merge? then ?submerge? with male dominated sports organizations an d structures in order to participate. The Olympic Games is a key example of women have to merge and submerge with a male dominated organization. The first modern Olympics, held in 1896, did not allow women participants. And when women were allowed to participate, in 1900, it was in only three sports and out of the 1,225 athletes, only nineteen were women. The Olympics have allowed women to ?merge?, thus enabling women to participate in the games and rise to the level that they compete at today, however women are still ?submerged? within the dominant male sport structure, as can be seen with the present imbalance of men?s and women?s events and the significantly higher number of male athletes than females. Though equal participation of male and female athletes needs to be further developed, the mere idea of female participation in organized ?male? sports is socially and culturally significant by empowering women and breaking barriers that hinder women in all aspects of life.Women hav e always been regarded as the weaker sex and the role of the woman was always to be submissive, passive and obedient to men. With sports, women hardly had a role at all until the twentieth century. Using the Olympics as an example, female athletes were not even considered at the onset of the modern games, and when they were allowed to compete in the second games in the 1900s, their presence was not taken seriously, only nineteen women competed, and only in three sporting events golf, archery, and tennis. However, the merging of women into the Olympic games has come a long way, as can... .... This problem is not one that can easily be solved. Until everyone, including women, unlearns the stereotypes, which hinder women all around the world, something as simple as women playing sports will not fully be embraced or accepted. The merging of female athletes into male sporting arenas has been a milestone in illustrating womens capabilities, but we are still only partway there. As is illu strated through the submerging of women in the Olympics, women are still not social equals to men. Countries that restrict women to the extreme still thrive and refuse to allow women to pursue sports because of the cultural beliefs, and even in democratic societies women are still not regarded as equal to men. Until the idea of equality is truly accepted by society, womens sports will always be submerged, not only on the playing field, but in the entire realm of life.